Archive for March, 2007

Second Life Political Scandal

Well, just about every online marketer is familiar with the buzz, potential, and hype of Second Life (ooh, that kind of rhymed). While Kate marvels over how her avatar Katicus Sparrow has celebrity look-alikes, Montreal marketing guru Mitch Joel argues:

Why would Avatar-based marketing be any different from marketing to consumers in an online social network or via other self-publishing environments? Avatars tend to really replicate who an individual “is,” or more appropriately, would like to “be.” […] Having an Avatar in a virtual world enables a person to live out their fantasy… and get away with it.

Well, it seems that Mitch is only half right. It turns out that the realness of Second Life has finally been consummated with a real life political scandal. Unfortunately for those involved, the consummation of it’s reality has manifested along the lines of not getting away with living their fantasy. The Wonkette reports:

Julie MacDonald, the Interior Department’s Assistant Secretary of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, is in a bit of hot water for, well, the usual cronyism bullshit that every single hack in every single department is guilty of to varying degress. One of the complaints: she was a bit careless with sensitive DoI documents, and, you know, tended to forward a lot of them on to lobbyists and right-wing think tanks. Oh, and random 14-year-old internet nerds.

onlinegames.jpg

Yeah, she sent the documents to some dude she was cybering with in Second Life (probably). He was probably a giant feces-spewing monster of some kind.

If government agencies thought that they had a problem with bloggers, they might not have seen anything yet. Social media is democratizing information in ways that just might overshadow the significance of the Gutenberg Press. Users (re people & citizens) are connecting to each other in ways never before imagined, and it seems that nothing will soon be sacred — or classified.

Blogs, Your Company, & Bad Press

A little while ago we sang American Apparel’s praises for publishing their hate mail on their company blog. We later built this into what we called the reverse psychology of 2.0. Basically, we saw six major advantages to embracing bad-press and negative public opinion on your company blog: Continue reading ‘Blogs, Your Company, & Bad Press’

Mainstream Media, Death Rattling, & The Doors

Have you ever wondered what a death rattle sounds like to mainstream media execs? Well, it doesn’t sound anything like th dial tones and burps of a dial-up modem. No, it’s a lot more like Jim Morrison crooning them into an eternal slumber. Some fascinating (re terrifying if your a mainstream media exec) figures from Market Watch that came to us via HipMojo.

  • New York Times stock has halved since trading above $50/share in 2002.
  • CD sales have fallen 20% in the first quarter of this year alone.
  • between 2000 and 2006, advertising pages have dropped 23.8% in Time magazine and 17.6% in Newsweek.
  • You know, they say that by the time a revolution is underway, it’s already happened. That it was able to get started means that power doesn’t sit where it used to, and now it’s just a question of who’s going to emerge from the turmoil as the new big cheese — and guess what: it’s almost never the old guard. So we have some suggestions for all you mainstream media loyalists out there:

    1. if you’re a newspaper, take SearchAnyway’s advice on how to cut costs
    2. if you’re a Hollywood or music exec, hurry up and jump ship before your own gets boarded by pirates from a much smaller one.
    3. if you’re a content producer (music, video, whatever, etc.), start doing it yourself because you don’t need anyone else anymore, so there’s no reason to even try.
    4. if you’re a writer or photographer, get to know us because we can make you famous without you having to trade your soul or property rights.

    We can go on and on all day about this one, but we’ll cut it short here. It’s Friday and we have an empire to build. We’ll catch all you bloggers out there in, well, the future.

    Define Twit: A Twitter User

    Disclosure: Chris is in the employ of both AnAesthetic Media and SearchAnyway.

    Yesterday, Chris over at the SearchAnyway Blog posted this video commentary on Twitter. It was in response to Mitch Joel’s most recent post on Twitter. We thought it was, well, riveting — but that’s only because we dig verbose commentary on social media.

    [youtube]BgeiaK1lh2I[/youtube]

    A Short History of Blogging

    We’ve been very bad bloggers lately. If you’re going to blog, you should really be blogging everyday, and we haven’t been doing that. Consequently, there probably isn’t anyone reading this. But we’re a start-up, we feel (but aren’t) over-extended at times, and it’s hard to divert attention away from critical development to reach out to the vast online community. After all, what’s the point of reaching out if you don’t have anything to offer.

    In any case, out latest project has begun rolling out, and we’ll probably announce it tomorrow. But to jump back into the blogging foray in the in the time being, we thought that we should blog about, well, blogging! And the reason we thought this is because we came across this great post on HipMojo that’s all about the Evolution of Blogs.

    It seems to us that the most interesting years were the early and most critical, between 1995 and 1999. So we’ve posted an excerpt from that era below. I think you’ll be able to see why these were the most exciting times in blogging. However, the timeline is rather fascinating all on its own, and you should probably head over to the original post and check it out in its entirety. In any case, here’s our own highlight: Continue reading ‘A Short History of Blogging’

    You’re Watching Big Brother

    I fucking it! Subliminal messages were just too cool of a concept to not work. A new study (Attentional Load Modulates Responses of Human Primary Visual Cortex to Invisible Stimuli) has found that even when you’re not aware of an image, your brain is. As Science Daily reports:

    University College London researchers have found the first physiological evidence that invisible subliminal images do attract the brain’s attention on a subconscious level. […]

    Dr Bahador Bahrami, of the UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and the UCL Department of Psychology, said: “What’s interesting here is that your brain does log things that you aren’t even aware of and can’t ever become aware of. We show that there is a brain response in the primary visual cortex to subliminal images that attract our attention — without us having the impression of having seen anything. These findings point to the sort of impact that subliminal advertising may have on the brain. What our study doesn’t address is whether this would then influence you to go out and buy a product. I believe that it’s likely that subliminal advertising may affect our decisions — but that is just speculation at this point.”

    Now, Dr. Bahrami’s has a reputation to uphold, so he has to adhere to ethics and not outright say that cool-ass shit like subliminal messaging will make you buy shit, but when a scientist says that he believes that it may affest out decisions, it’s because he’s pretty much sold on the cause-and-effect relationship. Really, just think about it for minute: all advertisers have to do to make you buy shit is to get you to associate their product with things that you hold in high esteem. Then, the next time you have make a choice as a consumer, you’ll go the path that you (for some reason you just don’t get) associate with what you deem admirable. Take the example of male smokers and Joe Camel.

    versus

    Not only are you going to associate the idea of smoking Camel cigarettes with being white-tuxedo cool, but with having a big dick. Basically, marketers play off of our need to project an image to get us to buy shit. Just like Camel goes after those who admire the suave playboy, Marlboro goes after those who see themselves as the strong, silent type.

    versus

    This is what’s known as lifestyle marketing folks. Basically, consumers al fit into some lifestyle demographic. So as a marketer, all you have to do is determine which of those demographics would be most amenable to the consumption of your product (compare net disposable income against the population of the demographics in question) , and associate your product with that lifestlye. Then, if you’re half as good at your job as I am, you just sit back and watch the sheep stampede to the slaughter.

    If you don’t believe me, just think of how Volks Wagen has taken this a step further with the Jetta Report. As the site unapologetically admits:

    Doing for car culture what the Kinsey Report did for sex in the 50s

    You now have the opportunity to contribute to the Jetta Report. This landmark study blazes a wide path through the automotive field, continuously collecting data on a myriad of issues and activities. It compares the values, behaviours, and attitudes of VW owners to those of the rest of the population. The resulst offer not only a peek into the life of the Jetta owner, but it also potrays a glimps of the Canadian psyche.

    Not only is VW admitting that they lifestyle market, but they (and the Simmons Market Research Bureau) are trying to collect quantitative data about the lifestyle habits of their target demographic. Of course, they could then use these for cross-portotional purposes and future product development.

    But more to the point, they can the develop future advertising campaigns to reflect behaviours and attitudes that potential VW buyers (re people who have the right income) can already relate to. Consequently, the next time their in the market for a new set of wheels, they’ll find themselves thinking about a Jetta without necessarily ever having been in one.

    That’s how subliminal advertising works. It’s not some voodoo mojo that sends you scrambling to the check-out counter like a consumer-zombie. Rather, it sends you the message that if this is what you like, or if this is how you want to appear to others, this product was meant for you. Incidentally, this is exactly how smoking makes you look like a fire-breathing bad-ass.

    Original story via Slashdot.

    Reverse Psychology: PR 2.0

    A little while back, we lauded American Apparel for publishing their Hate Mail on their company blog. A few days later, the SearchAnyway blog posted about blogging toward a positive image, and mentioned our stance on leveraging negative opinion in your favor. They then went on to elaborate on our own point, saying:

    In doing so, not only do they come off as the antithesis of corporate arrogance, but they really detract from the criticism that consumers make. First of all, most people write complaints when they are in an aggravated state. […] By letting them publish their belligerent rants, you not only make them seem less credible, but all similar crtitiques less credible.

    More to the point, however, by freely airing those criticisms, you make them seem like less of a deal and, therefore, less of a problem.

    Continue reading ‘Reverse Psychology: PR 2.0′



    Close
    E-mail It